Flossing is a cornerstone of good oral hygiene, but for many, the fiddly task of using string floss can be a frustrating experience. Thankfully, dental care has evolved to offer a wider range of options, with great emphasis now placed on the role of hygiene and preventative therapy.
Two alternatives to traditional options are water and electric flossers. Both promise a more user-friendly approach, but which one is the better choice for you?
Method
Water flossers utilise a pressurised stream to dislodge food particles and plaque from between teeth and along the gumline. This can be particularly beneficial for those seeking a clean and invigorating feeling after meals.
Electric versions, on the other hand, employ a different strategy. These handy devices use micro-vibrations on tiny disposable tips to gently massage the gums and remove debris between teeth. This method offers a more traditional flossing experience, similar to string floss.
Effectiveness
Water flossers provide a fresh feeling as they excel at flushing out food debris. However, they might not be as efficient for removing plaque buildup, particularly in tight spaces between teeth. Electric options can be just as effective as traditional floss in removing plaque and bacteria, making them a great alternative for those seeking a thorough clean.
Ease of use
Flossing shouldn’t be a chore, and both types offer advantages in terms of ease of use. Water flossing devices are generally considered simpler to handle. They come with adjustable pressure settings, allowing you to customise the experience for maximum comfort. Electric models require some manoeuvring of the tip between teeth which, although might take some practice to perfect, can feel quite natural once you’ve got the hang of it.
Suitability
The best tool for you depends on your individual needs and preferences. Water-based alternatives are ideal for people with dexterity issues or gum sensitivity. The gentle stream of fluid can be more comfortable on sensitive gums compared to the scraping motion of traditional floss. Additionally, for those who find traditional flossing too fiddly, the ease of use can be a game-changer.
Electric devices, on the other hand, might be a better choice for those with tight spaces between teeth where plaque build-up can be a concern. Additionally, if you’re used to the feeling of traditional floss, they might provide a more familiar experience.
There’s no clear winner in the battle as both offer unique benefits. The best choice depends on your own needs and preferences, and it’s recommended to consult a professional dentist for personalised advice.
My experience
After finishing my course of Invisalign last year, I actually invested in a water flosser, partly because I became fastidious about flossing during my treatment and wanted to go that extra mile. Also, I have very crowded teeth and food particles can easily get stuck – something that regular string floss wasn’t really taking care of too well.
It did take a couple of attempts to get used to using the waterpik without getting water all over my face, but after that I was hooked. It really left my teeth with an amazingly clean feeling, almost as if I had just had a scale and polish at the dentist. The only downside is that it doesn’t seem to hold a charge for very long (only 3-4 days), as I purchased the cordless version.
Photo credit: header, water flosser
Leave a Reply